The Science of Feedback
By Staci Yutzie
Feedback is an essential component in police training. It is one of the most powerful tools a trainer can use to increase learning and improve performance in a trainee. However, feedback does not always lead to a positive outcome, and when misused, it can degrade the performance of the trainee. Unfortunately, giving good feedback is a skill that is often overlooked when training our trainers.
Research tells us that only one-third of feedback is helpful, one-third has no effect, and one-third results in adverse effects. This might seem shocking, considering the amount of feedback trainers provide daily. The question is: how can trainers ensure that their feedback is part of the one-third that is helpful?
Improving trainees’ performance through practice requires feedback. The type of feedback and how it is delivered matters. The purpose of feedback is to guide the trainee’s future behavior, but often, feedback falls into one of the following ineffective traps.
The first is that the feedback is too vague, “You did that wrong,” “That was good,” or worse, “Did you even learn anything?” Effective feedback is specific. It focuses on the particular aspects of the performance that need improvement rather than a generic evaluation of the performance. Effective feedback avoids abstract praise or discouragement. Additionally, feedback focused on the task contributes to improved performance, but feedback directed at the person contributes to adverse effects.
The second is that the feedback is too much, i.e., “Ten things you did wrong” rather than prioritized. Too much feedback is not helpful; it overwhelms the trainee. It fails to communicate which aspects of their performance deviate most from the goal and where they should focus their future efforts. Effective feedback requires thinking carefully about what information will be most helpful to trainees at a particular time and limiting areas of focus to three to five items.
A quick distinction: feedback and instruction are not the same thing. Effective trainers need to be able to diagnose what individual trainees need in a particular setting and direct their feedback at appropriate levels for individual trainees. Trainees who do not know enough about a topic need instruction, not feedback.
A third trap is that trainers jump too soon to intervene or correct trainee behaviors. This could be the stereotypical yelling “Wrong!” as a trainee reaches for the door handle. While this restraint may feel counterintuitive, intervening too soon takes away the opportunity for trainees to learn to recognize and repair their own errors, a critical skill in the field.
This also requires a diagnosis from trainers regarding the best time to intervene. Immediate error correction during the learning stage can be helpful, but immediate error correction during the fluency-building stage can prevent the learner from developing automaticity (the ability to complete the task without having to think through each component). Effective timing of feedback delivery should allow the trainee the opportunity to recognize and correct their own mistakes, allowing them to become independent and self-regulated learners. A good rule is to intervene when trainees have shown significant signs of not recognizing their errors or have made multiple unsuccessful attempts to fix their errors.
The last trap is providing feedback that is artificial or fluff. This is often the case when trainers try to give a feedback sandwich (positive-negative-positive) and search for something positive to say when performance is subpar. This could be feedback that is not goal-directed, such as “Your hair looks good” when the skill being practiced is high-risk vehicle stops.
Effective feedback should be balanced, but discussing strengths is not about making the trainee feel good or preventing hurt feelings. Effective feedback means balancing positive feedback—feedback that indicates which aspects of the trainee’s knowledge and performance should be maintained and built upon—with negative feedback about which aspects should be adjusted and ideally how.
Trainers and trainees may feel that the role of the trainer is to tell them what to do better. To make feedback more meaningful, trainers should make trainees part of this process. If a trainer works harder than the trainee in this process, the trainee needs to take more ownership of their learning.
A model for effective feedback at the end of a skill practice, such as a scenario, involves the trainee and the trainer answering three questions:
First, where am I going? Rather than asking a trainee, “What did you have?” ask them to explain their goal or what they were trying to achieve. In this step, trainers should ensure the trainee clearly knows the expected goal, outcome, or standard. If the trainee does not clearly understand the expectation, they cannot demonstrate excellent performance.
Second, how am I going? Ask the trainee to self-assess and describe how their current level of performance is relative to the goal. In this step, trainers should ensure the trainee knows how their current performance relates to good performance and help them understand any discrepancies.
Last, where to next? Trainees must know how to close the gap between current and good performance. Trainers should identify specific, prioritized, timely, and balanced actions that the trainee must take in the next iteration.
As the policing profession moves toward more effective science-based training, understanding how feedback helps or hinders learning is essential. This may require letting go of long-held beliefs about what feedback should entail, but training will be more effective and efficient because of it.
About the Author
Dr. Staci Yutzie has worked in public safety for over twenty years. She is a practitioner-researcher who seeks to improve outcomes by examining and applying research rather than relying on “what we’ve always done.” She has spent the last decade working in police training as a developer, instructor, and director. She is now helping others as an independent consultant. Staci can be reached at catalystpoliceconsulting@gmail.com.
The ILEETA Journal
The ILEETA Journal is the official publication of the International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association, offering expert insights on law enforcement training, leadership, and wellness. The full journal archive is an exclusive benefit for ILEETA members. Explore more at the Journal Archive.